Contents


FDRAG Home
Legal Commentary
Standards for Innocence
Size of Death Row Declines
News from the inside
Birth of Isaac
Birthdays
Book Winners
More from the inside
Convicted, Executed, Not Guilty
Book Review
Paws -ing to bloviate
Share-a-book
Membership


All Newsletters

Florida Death Row Advocacy Group

Working to Maintain and Improve Living
Conditions for Death Row in Florida

VOLUME –VII- JULY/AUGUST 2005

(Personal opinions of our Guest writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FDRAG or its members)

Flutter Glide

Graced with nature this morn and
Having sweated buckets playing ball,
A twisted cigarette I adored,
Whilst Florida Sunshine enthralled.

Hark. A fluttering glint perceived,
Proving itself a floatful being.
Wings velvety black and bejeweled:
The magical lass was sadly fencing.

Her foe of steel and bleak wire,
A dark contrast to Ms Float's coat;
Back and forth entrapped by a desire
To escape an airbound moat.

Her plight stunningly lovely;
I relished her dance tragically;
Telepathically encouraging her onwardly,
Not turning back, but reaching an opening.

Alas! Did she hear?
Did my thought usher her through?
Escaping the fence, no longer in fear:
She glides hawk-like in velvety plume.

Zak

Rose Created by BUTCH at UCI

More from the inside


Cut me, hurt me, make me bleed…
Your ego demands you hear me scream
Make me plead.
In your weakness, I broke into your mind
Discovered your shame and fear
And the evil cowering there.
I know you as you will never know me.
For what you truly are.
The truth ain’t in you,
Well beyond your ken, literally too far
For these reasons , my pain
You will never se; never hear,
But your time comes, do be aware.
Though you don’t believe; He is there.
I fear nothing you can do
So, you hate me;
Misuse your prowess to twist the truth.
Take my life, I do no despair
I know, in due time
Justice will prevail.
I pity your pettiness.
And take no pleasure in it.
But, when your judgment rains in witness,
I will be there in that minute.
In my weakness I have hated you,
For what you’ve done to me.
For which I am ashamed.
Though you gave no mercy here.
I ask it for you; in His name
I am at peace, may you find the same.

Anthony Lamarca

Mordenti gets life in prison

By CANDACE RONDEAUX, Times Staff Writer
Published August 18, 2005

Michael Mordenti was sentenced to life in prison Thursday for the murder of Thelma Royston. Mordenti, who previously had served 14 years on death row before winning a new trial, must serve 25 years before he's eligible for parole.
Mordenti, who maintained his innocence when he spoke at the sentencing hearing, went through three trials for the 1989 murder-for-hire case.
His conviction in the first trial was overturned, and the second ended in a mistrial earlier this year. A third jury convicted him again on Monday, but prosecutors had previously agreed not to seek the death penalty this time.

If you are Spanish Speaking/writing and you need a friend.

Please contact me. Hannah


Convicted, Executed, Not Guilty New York Times

EDITORIAL DESK | July 14, 2005, Thursday
By BOB HERBERT
-- If Larry Griffin were being tried today for the murder of Quintin Moss, he would almost certainly be acquitted. The evidence is overwhelming that he did not kill Mr. Moss. But Mr. Griffin is not being tried today. He has already been executed for the murder.
While significant, this development is not that much of a surprise to those who understand that human beings are fallible and that much of the criminal justice system in the United States is a crapshoot. Whether it is this case or some other, it is inevitable that we will learn of someone who has been executed for a crime that he or she did not commit.
Judges and juries are no less prone to mistakes than politicians, reporters, doctors, engineers or center fielders. Which is why the death penalty should be abolished.
Larry Griffin's case is probably not the best one for advancing this argument, but it's the case at hand. He was not a solid citizen. While it seems clear that he did not commit the crime for which he was executed - the killing of Mr. Moss - he did plead guilty to killing someone else.
Mr. Griffin's character, or lack of same, does not make the principle at stake any less valid. This was recognized by Jennifer Joyce, the circuit attorney in St. Louis, where Mr. Moss was murdered way back in 1980. Ms. Joyce has taken the extraordinary step of officially reopening a murder investigation after the defendant was executed.
Quintin Moss was 19 years old and a locally well-known drug dealer when he was shot 13 times in a drive-by attack on a notorious block in St. Louis known as "The Stroll." A bystander, Wallace Conners, was also shot but not seriously wounded.
Mr. Conners, who knew Larry Griffin, saw the men who drove up and opened fire. He said Mr. Griffin was not one of the men. But he was never called, either by the prosecution or the defense, to testify at Mr. Griffin's trial.
The key testimony was given by Robert Fitzgerald, a professional criminal who said he had witnessed the murder and identified Mr. Griffin as one of the shooters.
Mr. Fitzgerald was in the federal witness protection program at the time. He had a number of felony charges pending and was an admitted user of heroin and speed.
A Missouri Supreme Court justice said of Mr. Fitzgerald: "The only eyewitness to the murder had a seriously flawed background, and his ability to observe and identify the gunman was also subject to question."
There was no physical evidence against Mr. Griffin, and no one else at the trial placed him at the scene of the attack. But he was convicted nevertheless, and executed by lethal injection on June 21, 1995
Mr. Fitzgerald was formally released from custody on the day Mr. Griffin was convicted.
One of the reasons we have not had a definitive example of the execution of an innocent person is that official investigations cease once the death penalty has been carried out.
In this case, an extremely unusual private investigation was conducted after Mr. Griffin's death. It was sponsored by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and led by Samuel Gross, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School. That investigation has pretty much demolished Mr. Fitzgerald's account of what occurred and prompted Ms. Joyce to reopen the case.
Mr. Conners, the wounded bystander, says flatly that Mr. Fitzgerald, who died last year, was not at the scene when the attack took place. And a St. Louis police officer who supported Mr. Fitzgerald's account at the trial now says that Mr. Fitzgerald told him, "I didn't see nothing."
The officer says he can't explain why he supported Mr. Fitzgerald's false testimony at the trial.
Professor Gross, who has received extensive pro bono help from prominent law firms, has given prosecutors the names of three men he believes committed the murder, and the evidence that points to their guilt.
Ms. Joyce, who is reopening the case, was not in the circuit attorney's office when Mr. Griffin was prosecuted. She told me in a telephone conversation yesterday, "I just want to see the truth."
The investigation will be thorough, she said, adding, "I wanted to take an independent look at it, and if mistakes were made, do what I can to rectify them, recognizing that there may not be much I could do."
BOOK REVIEW BY JO GIBBS
‘Once’ by James Herbert.

Not being a lover of horror stories in any shape or form, I was encouraged to read the book ‘Once’ with the promise of just a touch of gothic horror within its pages. I had to agree the story seemed innocuous enough for a novice like me. Having read the publishers blurb: ‘Remember the fairy stories you were told when you were a child? Tales of tiny, magical, winged beings and elves, wicked witches and goblins. Demons…. What if one day you found they were true? What if, when you become an adult, you discovered they were all based on fact? What if you met the fantasy and it was all so very real? That’s what happened to Thom Kindred. The wonders were revealed to him. But so were the horrors, for not far behind the Good, there always lurks the Bad. And the Bad had designs on Thom. The Bad would show him real evil. He would see the hellhagges and the demons. He would be touched by perverted passion. And corruption. And he would encounter his own worst nightmare. The Bad would seek to destroy him. And only the magic of the little beings would be able to help him. ‘Once’ Herbert’s new novel of erotic love and darkest horror, will take you to a realm where fantasy and reality collide, where fairytales really can come true.….. I wondered what I was actually going to come across, but Once is a very well written story that has great depth, yet flows along nicely, as only an author of James Herbert’s caliber can create – you feel the years of experience in the writing and the visual images created are unhindered by broken prose. It is a curious mix of the horror genre with fairy story, making it an adult fairytale. The tale starts when Thom Kindred, 27 years old, returns to the house of his childhood, Little Bracken, to recover from a stroke induced by a car accident. Little Bracken is a woodland retreat in the Castle Bracken Estate that has many memories for Thom, most of which have been unknowingly suppressed. Thom’s mother had been tutor and governess to Hugo Bleeth, son of the castle’s owner. During his rehabilitation strange events unfold that have a lot to do with his past and even more to do with his future. A future that looks pretty grim at times especially when the housekeeper at the Bracken Estate is sent to help him settle in, but instead is the evil sent to destroy him. The paperback runs to 420 pages, so this is no simple childish tale. Surprisingly I found the scenes of horror sat comfortably alongside the fantastical. The characters are wonderful, erotic devious and evil, a nice original idea and a fantastic introduction into horror for the previously uninitiated.

Published by Macmillan $10

‘State of Fear’ by Michael Crichton
Michael Crichton has always used the latent but, in his view, under appreciated dangers associated with scientific advancement as a theme in his books - microbiology in the Andromeda Strain, genetic engineering in Jurassic Park, and so on. In State of Fear he reverses field and uses the incorrectly perceived threats of global environmental disaster as the underlying impetus for a novel. In Crichton’s view, the whole global warming argument is false. His view is that environmentalism has degenerated into a quasi-religious system, devoid of scientific honesty. Thus, the proponents of the global warming hysteria are pushing faith over fact, many of them have lost their moorings and the inevitable result is a grand conspiracy.
The story starts out with a series of seemingly disconnected events in Paris where a physicist dies after performing a laboratory experiment for a beautiful visitor. In the jungles of Malaysia a mysterious buyer purchases deadly cavitation technology, built to his specification.

In Vancouver a small research submarine is leased for use in the waters off New Guinea, and in Tokyo an intelligence agent tries to understand what it all means. California also comes into focus as we discover the National Environment Resource Centre, a fictitious environmental organization, is planning a gigantic world-wide conspiracy incorporating catastrophes to simulate imagined impacts of a sudden climate change. At the heart of this conspiracy is Nick Drake, head of a radical environmentalist group. Outraged that a significant source of funding has been closed by the donors, getting Drakes science debunked by a MIT professor, Drake sets out on a murderous course that is designed to both do away with his detractors and enemies while concomitantly creating a profound state of fear about global warming among the public. Our heroes, male and female, led by John Kenner, manage to scotch the evil doings of their egomaniac chief, Nicholas Drake – but just barely. Drake and his followers trigger a series of natural disasters, including a super-size hurricane and gigantic 60 foot tsunami-like waves that would hit California; these disasters would be timed to occur at the time of a big media conference, thereby awakening the public to the dangers of climate change by Global Warming. In the process, Kenner and company survive all sorts of perils, from frostbite and death by multiple lightening strikes to captivity by cannibals in the South Pacific. As is generally the case with Crichton, an avalanche of scientific data is conveyed in his usual informative yet entertaining manner. Many, as I did, will debate the validity of Crichton’s ‘science’ as regards the issue of global warming. In fact I’ve since spent hours researching global warming, comparing and contrasting Crichton’s theory against scientific fact, although it may sound boring it’s fascinating reading as many influences on the climate are so poorly known.
As Crichton so deftly displays in this novel, this issue has become more political than scientific in many ways and there is no reason this novel wont be analyzed in that light.
The story has all the traditional strengths and weakness of a Crichton novel, he is an accomplished technician and that comes through. It can justifiably be called a page-turner, and although I was on holiday recently I read this book transfixed, until I had finished every page. I suspect that Crichton is motivated by the same anger of so many of us – to see a science misused for political purposes or just to gain grants from government foundations.
However, the methodology of using characters to do the education creates a scenario wherein the characters become somewhat robotic and predictable, not truly fully fleshed out human beings and at times I felt Crichton was using this story purely as a vehicle for his own theories.
However that’s me quibbling. This is a very fine novel. I suspect one’s enjoyment will be colored to a degree with how one leans to, or away from Crichton’s premise. It may also, hopefully, cause many of us to research the ‘truth’ on global warming. I hope this book is read by Senators like McCain and Lieberman in the US, and in my country, England; by Britain’s science advisor Sir David King who says that cities like London, New York and New Orleans will be among the first to go if the Greenland ice cap and Antarctica melted. Although Crichton displays no political agenda, his book will strengthen the position of President Bush in turning down the Kyoto Protocol. That aside this ranks as one of his better works.
Published by Harper Collins in paperback price: $7.99

Paws -ing to bloviate…by …R.Udeasheck


Miss Hannah surfs the Inter-nets (as our President calls it) and calls our attention to a new site, asking us to comment. Warning: This isn’t going to be pretty……
The site Miss Hannah found is owned by a group of people for whom not even the State of Texas can kill people fast enough, and their stated mission is “to encourage inmates on death row to stop abusing the legal system and accept the punishment that was handed out to them by a jury of their piers [sic] . We our [sic] sole purpose is to support those inmates who have chosen to do the right thing, and also to encourage those who are thinking about it.” Their plan is as simple as their spelling is atrocious: “Can you afford 37 cents a week? If you can I will tell you what you can do to make the lives of millions of Americans better. For the cost of a single stamp, you can write a letter to a death row inmate and urge them to drop their appeals and to face the justice they deserve.
When Miss Hannah and I first discussed whether we should even give these fuckwits the time of day, it was a difficult decision, because 1) we didn’t want to share this ugliness with you – and 2) specifically, we don’t want you to think for one minute that this miserable group of batshit crazies (who are anything but “swift” and who wouldn’t recognize “justice” if it jumped up and bit them on the ass) represent anyone but themselves.
However, unfortunately, the DOC execution list is a stark reminder of just how many people on Florida’s death row in recent years have given up their appeals, and we sadly have to consider that others may be contemplating this action in the future. We also acknowledge that groups such as FDRAG have no power to make any but the most insignificant improvements in the lives of those on the row – and implicitly, we also recognize that we have no right to attempt to influence any such decision. That said, we would like to warn about the ‘Citizens Badly in Need of Getting Laid for Swift Justice’ and their utterly frivolous claim to provide “support” for those who decide to give up their appeals. Unfortunately, as parts of the website are locked to non-members (and may be accessed only via password), we are not able to see the letters the group initially sends out to – apparently random – recipients. One follow-up letter (to a prisoner who did respond to them) which was briefly posted on the accessible part of the site, made use of the facts of the alleged crime to construct an argument that the prisoner should give up his life as a way of validating that of his victim. This doesn’t mean, of course, that the members of ‘CSJ’ give 2 hairs off the balls of a dead donkey about any victim – obtaining the facts of a death penalty case requires nothing more than looking it up on the aforementioned Internets.

Neither do they give a shit about justice, as even the most gruesome facts have nothing to do with the issue of whether a conviction & sentence should be subject to review. The only thing we can conclude with any certainty whatsoever that the members of ‘CSJ’ care about is the gratification of their own blood thirst – they are the sort of people who read newspaper accounts of executions for much the same purpose as the average guy reads the Victoria’s Secret catalogue – and they prowl death rows nationwide hoping to find prisoners who are despondent enough to give up their appeals, and lonely enough to think that these might actually be people who would ‘support’ them and be with them in their greatest time of need. Oh, and as for the prisoner who responded to them? His letter to them was posted on the open-access part of the website, where it was mocked and belittled by many, many members of the group in an apparent competition to reach all new levels of viciousness. Their absolute glee over the fact that the prisoner actually expressed willingness to consider their particular brand of justice could only be described in terms that I am unable to reproduce, as Miss Hannah has just informed me that I have used up my quota of four-letter words. So I guess I have to conclude: Should you ever be contacted by members of this group (they won’t present themselves as members of a group, but you’ll recognize the tone and purpose of the letter, not to mention the arbitrary mutilation of spelling and grammar), please do not even dignify them with a response. You are entitled to review of your conviction and sentence – indeed, the only way this nightmare will ever end is to challenge it at every opportunity & persist in doing so. If you ever do find yourself contemplating giving up those rights, please don’t do it because you think for one moment that a group of people, whose notion of justice is a tailgate party outside a prison to celebrate the deliberate killing of a defenseless man or woman, has arrived at anything remotely resembling a valid argument for doing so. All they have done is conceptualize a letter-writing campaign (and we use the term ‘letter-writing’ loosely as the proverbial one hundred monkeys left alone with a typewriter might well produce a more compelling read… certainly fewer spelling errors), targeting the most vulnerable, loneliest prisoners on death row – and in doing so, they have become what they claim to despise the most…. They have no respect for the law, and most assuredly no respect for victim-families who may very well not want this outcome. They do not deserve the amount of your time – let alone the “37 cents” it would take for you to respond to them. However, should you receive one of their letters, and decide that a response is requested, feel free to tell them from R. Udeasheck to go f@%& themselves (Miss Hannah should have let this slide – I’m only quoting the Vice President).
R.Udeasheck will be happy to reimburse the cost of a stamp!

THE FDRAG
Share-a-book program…

Each month, FDRAG will collect book/magazine wishes from the readers of our Newsletter. In order to submit a book wish, simply fill out the form, send it to FDRAG and your book may be one of the 10 book titles, which will be drawn each month, and purchased via Amazon.com….Because we want this program to benefit as many as possible on our shoestring budget, we ask that you pass on your book when you’re done reading it.



Name:

DOC:

Cell Location:

Author:

Title:


Dianne Abshire 9673 State Rt. 65
Ottawa Ohio, 45875
Tel: (419) 523-5816
Miscellaneous Questions
R. Udeasheck. at FDRAG’S location, we will then forward the mail to the rude creature.

The Information package/Legal Questions
For inside the USA contact:
Karin Elsea
1400 East West Highway #710
Silver Spring, MD 20910

Submissions to the newsletter
FDRAG ‘s NEW Adress

For information about visits and staying in Starke Hannah Floyd
14856 SE 25th Avenue
Starke Florida 32091
904 964 7303

For some Christian fellowship contact:
Chris C/O Grace community fellowship
P.O. Box 1072
Starke Fl. 32091
He is looking forward to your letter.

Greeting cards etc,,,,!!!!!!
Please address requests to Above-mentioned Karin, Dianne, or Roxanne