Contents


FDRAG Home
Legal Commentary
News from the inside
May Birthdays
May Book Winners
History and Customs
From the inside
More from the inside
Death Penalty
Book 'em Danno
Share-a-book
Membership


All Newsletters

Florida Death Row Advocacy Group

VOLUME -V- MAY 2005

(Personal opinions of our Guest writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FDRAG or its members)

From the inside


AS Water flowing to the sea
Another year has come to be;
And so, on this most special day,
From deep within my heart I pray
That you will see love’s guiding light
And follow it to me each night…..
“Dale”

In memory of Broderick Monlyn
(Dale) who passed away April 12th 2005.

Dale was born October 18th 1961 and he came to death row in 1993. Many have expressed grief and how much he will be missed. Fellow prisoners as well as Pen friends.



Created by Howard Ault,
currently at Broward county jail
Conformed or be silenced
People say I shouldn’t cuss…
People say that all I do is fuss…
People say I should change the way I talk…
People say that I should pull my pants up when I walk…
People say that I should change the way that I write…
People say that I should not fight…
People say I should be more like them…
People say that I should not be the man that I am…
When I try to be me people wont let me be
When I act like other people I’m called a follower…
But people tell me to be a leader…
When I don’t act or talk like people say…
They take my words away…
When people edit my words they silence me…
People control what I say they wont let me speak freely…
But how can you know me or what I have to say…
When you force me to speak, act and think your way….
Saifullah YHWH

More from the inside
My Brothers
This is an open letter and appeal to all death row prisoners here in Florida in the April FDRAG newsletter there is an article titled ‘lawmaker ask High Court for names of bad lawyers", in which Representative Bruce Kyle, who chairs the House Judiciary Counsel, sent a letter to chief Justice Barbara Pariente, of the Florida Supreme Court, asking the court to name names of bad registry lawyers . this will never happen and it shouldn’t be left up to these justices this is our respomnsibility.
I have never had a registry lawyer on my appeal I have heard dozens of horror stories about their work.
I am writing to ask any death row prisoner who has had problems with a registry attorney to write a letter giving their name and a brief summery to document the problems you have had. If you are not good at writing please don’t be ashamed to ask for help to write this letter, make 4 copies: one for yourself, one for Rep.
Bruce Kyle, one for Chief Justice Barbara Pariente and one to FDRAG. This is our opportunity to do something for ourselves so please don’t sit back and wait for the Florida Supreme Court to do our jobs. Because it is not going to happen!
Peace …..Al Green

Those of you responding to this can send your letter to FDRAG and we will copy it and sent it to the above mentioned people in question. If you prefer to do it yourself these are the addresses to sent your letter to:

State Representative Bruce Kyle 2120 Main Street Suite 208 Fort Meyers Florida 33901-3010

Honorable Chief Justice Barbara Periente Supreme Court of Florida 500 South Duval Street Tallahassee Florida 32399-1925

JOKE
One day, in line at the cafeteria, Bob says to Stanley behind him, "My elbow hurts like everything. I guess I better see a doctor."
"Listen, you don’t have to spend that kind of money", Stan replies, "There's a diagnostic computer down at Walmart. Just give it a urine sample and the computer will tell you what's wrong and what to do about it. It takes ten seconds and costs ten dollars... a lot cheaper than a doctor."
So Bob deposits a urine sample in a small jar and takes it to Walmart. He deposits ten dollars and the computer lights up and asks for the urine sample. he pours the sample into the slot and waits.
Ten seconds later, the computer ejects a printout: "You have tennis elbow. Soak your arm in warm water and avoid heavy activity. It will improve in two weeks."
That evening while thinking how amazing this new technology was, Bob began wondering if the computer could be fooled.

He mixed some tap water, a stool sample from his dog, urine samples from his wife and daughter, and some water from his favorite fishing hole for good measure. Bob hurried back to Walmart, eager to check the results. He deposits the ten dollars, pours in the concoction, and waits for the reply.
The computer prints the following:

  1. Your tap water is too hard. Get a water softener.
  2. Your dog has ringworm. Bathe him in anti-fungal shampoo.
  3. Your daughter has a cocaine habit. Get her into rehab.
  4. Your wife is pregnant. Twins. They aren't yours. Get a lawyer.
  5. If you don't stop fishing, your tennis elbow will never get better.
And as always, thank you for shopping at Walmart.
Death Penalty - 34 states permit executions

By every measure, the death penalty in the United States has been declining steadily since executions peaked in 1999, and the trend likely will continue in 2005.
Plummeting crime rates and recent revelations of innocent men being sentenced to death have eroded public support for capital punishment. Since the 1970s, 119 people in 25 states have been released from death row based on new exculpatory evidence, including 2 dozen in the past 3 years.
Death sentences have dropped by 54 % and executions by 40 % since 1999, with signify-cant reductions in all states that allow capital punishment, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit group that has been critical of capital punishment in practice.
Several recent court decisions also have narrowed the scope of the death penalty. The U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the execution of juveniles in March, sparing the lives of 72 juvenile offenders waiting on death row
Nationwide. This was the high court's first decision on the death penalty since 2002, when it banned the execution of the severely retarded.
At the state level, death penalty statutes in New York and Kansas were ruled unconstitutional by those states' high courts in 2004, and executions have been suspended in Illinois by a moratorium and in New Jersey by a temporary injunction by the state's high court. That leaves 34 states currently permitting executions. In New York, the Democrat-controlled state Assembly defeated an attempt to reinstate the death penalty on April 12, 2005, making New York the first state to abandon the death penalty since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated it in 1976. This action, which came just 10 years after the state legalized capital punishment, put New York at the fore-front of a list of states where politicians have stepped away from supporting capital punishment.
Death Penalty Timeline (Links to U.S. Supreme Court decisions provided by Cornell Law School’s Supreme Court Collection) 1972 - Furman v. Georgia: U.S. Supreme Court effectively voids 40 state death penalty statutes and suspends capital punishment, ruling that death sentences are handed down arbitrarily, violating the Eighth Amendment prohibition against "cruel and unusual punishment."
1976 - Gregg v. Georgia: U.S. Supreme Court allows states to rewrite their death penalty statutes. Florida reinstates the death penalty within five months, followed shortly by 34 other states. Kansas and New York reinstate the death penalty in 1994 and 1995, respectively.
1977 - Gary Gilmore is executed by firing squad in Utah on Jan.17 – first person executed since death penalty was reinstated.
1977 - Oklahoma becomes the 1st state to adopt lethal injection as a means of execution.
1977 - Coker v. Georgia: U.S. Supreme Court prohibits executions for rape when the victim is not killed.
1986 - Ford v. Wainwright: U.S. Supreme Court rules that execution of the mentally insane is unconstitutional.
1988 - Thompson v. Oklahoma: U.S. Supreme Court rules that execution of offenders who were 15 or younger at the time of their crime is Unconstitutional.
1989 - Stanford v. Kentucky, and Wilkins v. Missouri: U.S. Supreme Court rules that Eighth Amendment does not prohibit the death penalty for crimes committed at age 16 or 17.
1989 - Penry v. Lynaugh: U.S. Supreme Court rules that executing mentally retarded people does not violate the Eighth Amendment.
2000 - Illinois Gov. George Ryan orders moratorium on executions and appoints commission to study flaws in the state's death penalty system.
2002 - Ring v. Arizona: U.S. Supreme Court rules that juries, not judges, should decide sentence of death.
2002 - Atkins v. Virginia: U.S. Supreme Court reverses its 1989 decision in Penry v. Lynaugh and prohibits execution of the severely retarded Based on the Eighth Amendment.
2003 - Illinois Gov. George Ryan commutes death sentences of all 167 inmates on the state's death row before leaving office in January.

2004 - New York's death penalty statute declared unconstitutional by state's highest court in June. Kansas Supreme Court voids its death penalty law in December.
2005 - Roper v. Simmons - U.S. Supreme Court, reversing its 1989 decision, rules March 1 that executing juvenile offenders who were under 18 at the time of their crimes is unconstitutional.
Legislation aimed at either repealing the death penalty or imposing moratoriums on executions has been introduced in at least two dozen states in 2005. Only proposals in Connecticut and New Mexico have come to a vote, and both were narrowly defeated.
North Carolina lawmakers are actively conside-ring a bill that would impose a moratorium on executions and establish a commission to inve-stigate the state’s death penalty system. The legislation was introduced in response to the recent exonerations of five death row inmates. In New Jersey, where the court ordered state corrections officials to change the way lethal
Injections are administered; Acting Gov. Richard Codey (D) has called on the state Legislature to pass a moratorium against executions.
Illinois' moratorium, the only one in the country, was imposed by former Gov. George Ryan, a Republican, in 2000. Ryan sparked a national furor when he commuted the death sentences of all 167 Illinois inmates on death row before leaving office in 2003, citing a state investigation that uncovered police corruption and racial bias in the state's capital punishment system. The Illinois Legislature has passed several reform
Measures intended to persuade current Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich to lift the moratorium, but he has said the system is far from fixed.
These events follow a trend by lawmakers and the judiciary over the past 30 years to narrow the scope of the death penalty by tightening state
Sentencing statutes and banning the execution of specific groups of people, including the mentally insane, severely retarded and juvenile defendants.
However, a majority of Americans still support executions as the ultimate punishment, and the nation as a whole is far from abolishing the death penalty.
Constitutional experts say the current U.S. Supreme Court is unlikely to accept any cases seeking to overturn the death penalty system.
Although executions are rare at the federal level, the Clinton and Bush administrations have greatly expanded the potential use of capital punishment for some drug and terrorism crimes. And former U.S. Attorney General John D. Ashcroft directed his prosecutors to seek the death penalty in many cases, sometimes over-ruling local prosecutors who had decided against it.
At the state and local level, many prosecutors, victims' advocates and lawmakers remain staunch supporters of the death penalty, which they view as a necessary and effective deterrent to crime. Kansas officials are appealing the state court decision against their death penalty system In federal courts.
Bills to reinstate the death penalty have been introduced this year in many of the 12 states that lack it, including in Hawaii and Iowa, although
Neither of those bills came up for a vote.
Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) has pledged to propose legislation this year to reinstate the death penalty there. Romney commissioned a task force of forensic and legal experts last year to craft a statute that would execute only those killers whose guilt is not in doubt. The commission issued 10 recommen-dations to safeguard against wrongful convic-tions, including imposing stricter requirements for scientific evidence, such as DNA and finger-prints, and raising the bar for a death penalty sentence from the normal legal standard of guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt" to a finding of "no doubt about the defendant's guilt."
This "Backgrounder" is a work in progress and will be updated as warranted.

(source: Stateline.org)

[To Top]
[To Page 3.]